For C# developers looking to build 3D games, there are several excellent game engines and frameworks to choose from. Choosing the right engine can massively impact development time, project scope, performance, and overall game quality.
In this comprehensive article, we'll compare the most popular options—Unity, Monogame, OpenTK, Godot, Stride, and Flax—to help you decide which is best for your needs.
When examining the many game engine options available, here are some key criteria to consider:
We'll use these criteria later when comparing the top C# game engines. First let's overview the options in more detail.
Unity is the 800-pound gorilla of game engines. First launched in 2005, it's become the most popular engine for building high-fidelity 2D, 3D, AR, VR, and mobile games.
Some major games built with Unity include Call of Duty Mobile, Oddworld: Soulstorm, Genshin Impact, Ori and the Will of the Wisps, and Pokémon Go.
Unity provides high efficiency through its multithreaded engine architecture. It supports both DirectX and Vulkan, with its Data-Oriented Technology Stack (DOTS) optimized for multicore processors. Unity also utilizes aggressive batching to minimize draw calls.
Mobile is a key focus, with small binaries and optimized mobile rendering. On desktops, Unity is very performant for most non-AAA game types. The downside is larger file sizes due to engine overhead.
As the most used engine, Unity has the largest community by far. The official forums are active, along with resources like Unity Learn and Unity Connect. Over 3 million developers use Unity worldwide.
The asset store contains thousands of art assets, plugins, code packages, and tools created by the community. For support, multiple pricing tiers offer personalized help and services.
Unity is source-available, but not fully open source. The C# code and most editors can't be modified, but shader code and C++ plugins can be. Unity does allow creating custom components using C# and ECS.
The engine is highly modular and customizable within its design constraints. But being closed source, if core features are lacking they can't be added without Unity's involvement.
Unity has a steep initial learning curve. Full programming knowledge is not required, but recommended. Simple games can be built visually with the editor tools, but more complex games require scripting.
Excellent official tutorials, courses, and assets help shorten the learning curve. But expect to invest significant time reaching proficiency with Unity's immense feature set.
MonoGame is an open-source implementation of Microsoft's XNA game development framework for .NET languages, which was discontinued in 2013. Monogame carries the torch forward with continued enhancements.
Notable Monogame titles include Stardew Valley, Bastion, Fez, TowerFall, and Celeste.
Monogame uses hardware accelerated rendering via DirectX on Windows, OpenGL on Mac/Linux, and proprietary APIs on consoles. It renders efficiently with dynamic batching and instancing.
The lightweight managed codebase provides high performance across desktop and mobile. As it's not a full engine, there is flexibility to optimize rendering as needed. Lacking visual editors does result in more coding effort.
Monogame has a helpful user community on Discord and its forums. As an open source project, there is no official support team. But the active development community is quick to address issues.
The ecosystem offers some plugins and art assets, but far less than Unity or Unreal. Documentation is thorough but still incomplete. Overall the community provides adequate if limited resources.
As open source software, the full C# codebase for Monogame is available on GitHub allowing customization and extending the engine's capabilities.
Monogame is designed for modification. But you'll need strong programming knowledge to understand its architecture and rendering framework to make core changes.
Monogame's learning curve is high for newcomers. Simple 2D games can be coded with basic C# knowledge. But creating polished 3D games requires familiarity with graphics programming and math.
With its lower level APIs, Monogame gives lots of control but less hand-holding. The documentation helps explain key concepts. Expect to learn through trial-and-error and asking the community questions.
OpenTK is an open-source C# library for developing games and applications using OpenGL, OpenAL, and OpenCL. It provides cross-platform windowing and hooks into native APIs.
Commercial games using OpenTK include Space Engineers, Kerbal Space Program, Ravenfield, and Thea: The Awakening.
As a thin OpenGL wrapper, OpenTK provides excellent render performance. There is minimal overhead between C# and the native graphics API calls.
Games built on OpenTK gain the full performance of OpenGL. The tradeoff is OpenTK only provides primitive access. All engine systems and tools need custom building.
OpenTK has a small but skilled community. The forums and Discord offer assistance for specific issues. But information is lacking compared to full engines.
OpenTK is developed on GitHub, with contributions welcomed. Documentation covers key classes but lacks tutorials and guides. Resources are sparse overall.
OpenTK is open source specifically to enable customizing your graphics engine needs. The entire library can be modified as it's just C# code.
Being so low-level, OpenTK requires extensive programming knowledge to make use of its OpenGL bindings. Expect to build all game logic and tools yourself.
OpenTK's learning curve is incredibly steep. It expects proficiency with computer graphics concepts and C# coding. Simple demos may be feasible, but complete games require mastering OpenGL and related math.
There are few guides for progressing from basics to advanced implementations. Be prepared to be largely self-taught using online graphics resources to attain proficiency.
Godot is an advanced open-source game engine available under the MIT license. It supports developing 2D, 3D, VR, and multiplayer games using its scripting languages GDScript and VisualScript, as well as C#.
Notable games made with Godot include Oddmar, The Siege and the Sandfox, probability 0, and Tanks of Freedom.
Godot offers high performance through its rendering architecture. It supports low-level Vulkan for maximized draw call batching on supported platforms, as well as OpenGL ES 3.0+.
Mobile builds are small and efficient using GDNative libraries. In tests, Godot tops the charts for 2D engine performance across desktop and mobile hardware. 3D support is still improving.
Godot has an ever-growing user community with active forums, Discord, Facebook groups, and GitHub discussions. Support comes from fellow users and engine contributors.
Its asset library lags Unity's still, but does offer plenty of helpful art, scripts, plugins, and demo projects. The editor documentation is extensive, with increasing programming guides.
As FOSS, Godot's C++ and C# source code is freely available, allowing customization of its rendering, editors, and every system as desired.
Godot's node-based architecture makes it extremely modular. C# bindings give access to extend lower-level engine features. Godot is designed for modification and extension.
Godot's node-based visual tools allow beginners to build basic 2D games with little programming knowledge needed. Complex games will require GDScript or C# scripting.
The editor and script APIs are generally intuitive. Learning materials are improving, but still lag Unity and Unreal. 2D skills transfer well to Godot, but expect a steeper 3D learning curve.
Stride is an emerging open-source C# game engine and editor created by Stride3D. It aims for an artist friendly workflow for building high-quality games.
Stride is still under development, but shows promise as an alternative open source engine for crafting 3D worlds with C#.
Stride uses a modern rendering architecture to take advantage of GPU acceleration. It currently supports DirectX 11 with plans to add Vulkan. The engine can handle complex scenes through instancing, occlusion, and sensible defaults.
As an early project, performance testing is still minimal. The focus is on editor tools over runtime optimizations presently. Stride aims to rival Unity eventually in graphics and performance.
The Stride community is small but warm and helpful. The forums provide guidance as users learn the engine. The development team is also very responsive to feedback and questions.
Official documentation covers the editor, but is sparse for programming topics. Assets and prebuilt tools are still limited. But the engine is under active development, so resources are quickly expanding.
Stride delivers on the promise of open source access. The full C# engine code is available on GitHub to study and modify. Users are encouraged to help shape Stride through PRs.
The architecture allows swapping core modules like the renderer. While not as modular as Godot, Stride does enable customizing and extending key framework areas.
Stride aims to be accessible for artists, level designers, and programmers alike. The editor allows quick mockup of 3D levels and basic gameplay behaviors.
Programming the underlying C# logic still requires engine familiarity however. And documentation leans more to the visual tools presently. But overall Stride does lower the initial barrier well for beginners.
Flax is an advanced open source C# game engine built for high performance across desktop and mobile platforms. It provides a robust editor toolset for building detailed 3D worlds.
Flax delivers an impressive production-level engine for building detailed, polished 3D games.
Flax is engineered for maximum performance from the ground up. Its custom Vulkan renderer and multithreaded systems allow complex scenes with huge draw counts.
The editors feature extensive profiling tools to analyze bottlenecks. Flax targets 60 FPS framerates on mobile devices up to high-end PCs through rigorous optimizations.
Flax is primarily driven by its two lead developers with support from Patreon backers. The Discord community is an excellent place to get feedback and help. Documentation is still a work-in-progress.
As an ambitious FOSS project, Flax resources are expanding but can't rival commercial engines yet. The creators are very engaged though and progress has been steady.
Flax delivers source access as a true open source C# engine. Developers can inspect and modify its rendering, physics, audio, editor, and other subsystems.
While extremely flexible, Flax does have a more coupled architecture compared to modular engines like Godot. Still, customization is a core focus for the developers and community.
Flax provides deep tooling for level designers like terrain sculpting and modeling. Programmers will need strong C# skills along with graphics and engine architecture knowledge.
Onboarding resources are improving, but expect a steep climb mastering Flax right now. Long term it aims to rival AAA engines for complexity and capability. But there are still gaps in learning materials.
Now that we've surveyed the landscape of major C# game engines, let's directly compare them based on the key criteria outlined earlier.
| Engine | Graphics | Physics | Sound | Networking | VR | Tools | Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unity | Robust PBR renderer | Built-in physics engine | Fully featured audio engine | High level networking API | Robust VR support with XR tools | Full editor toolset for building games visually | Extensive official documentation and learning materials |
| Monogame | Medium level graphics API | Basic physics integration | Audio playback support | Networking packages available | VR render path available | Programming focus with some unofficial editors available | Official documentation covers API well but lacks beginner tutorials |
| OpenTK | Thin OpenGL binding | None built-in | Basic OpenAL audio bindings | Networking not supported | VR libraries available | No editor tools. Coding focused | Minimal official docs. Community wikis help explain |
| Godot | Advanced renderer with visual shaders | Dedicated physics engine | Feature rich audio engine with buses, effects | High level networking | GDNative supports OpenVR bindings | Excellent editor tools for building 2D and 3D games | Thorough official documentation and manuals |
| Stride | Physically based rendering | Early physics integration | Audio engine planned | Networking on roadmap | VR support planned post 1.0 | Full editor toolset modelled after Unity | Documentation exists but is sparse outside of editor |
| Flax | State of the art PBR renderer with ray tracing | Custom physics engine | Fully featured audio solution | Networking on roadmap | Desktop VR support in progress | Extensive tools for world building and asset creation | Documentation improving but still limited |
Unity remains the undisputed leader in features like mobile support, build pipeline, editor tooling, and documentation. But Godot and Flax both offer impressive capabilities as open source options.
| Engine | Desktop Rendering | Mobile Rendering | Build Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity | Very good. Has some overhead costs | Optimized mobile renderer | Large build sizes |
| Monogame | Excellent utilizing DX11/OpenGL | Good through OpenGL ES 3.0+ | Small build sizes |
| OpenTK | Extremely fast as raw OpenGL wrapper | Fast through OpenGLES | Minimal overhead |
| Godot | Very good with Vulkan support planned | Excellent with GDNative libraries | Small executable size |
| Stride | Still improving but aims for high performance | Planned optimizations forthcoming | Average build size |
| Flax | Cutting edge through Vulkan backend | Optimized through Vulkan and DOTS | Efficient mobile builds planned |
Monogame, OpenTK, and Flax shine for raw rendering performance across desktop and mobile. But, Godot and Unity offer the best blend of performance while providing robust engines and editors.
For mobile specifically:
For desktop, OpenTK provides the fastest raw OpenGL rendering. But for most developers, Unity and Godot offer great performance without needing low-level graphics coding expertise.
| Engine | User Base | Learning Resources | Assets | Support Options |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unity | Massive (millions of users) | Extensive tutorials, guides, courses | Asset Store has thousands of assets | Forum support, paid email/chat support |
| Monogame | Small but active | Documentation and wikis useful but limited | Small selection of community assets | Forums and Discord community |
| OpenTK | Tiny niche community | Minimal tutorials, guides are programmer focused | No asset pipeline | Forums have some activity |
| Godot | Large and rapidly growing | Good documentation and increasing online courses | Asset Library has helpful assets | Community based forums and Discords |
| Stride | Small early access community | Limited learning materials currently | Minimal assets available | Forum support from dev team |
| Flax | Very small in initial development | Documentation improving but still early | No asset pipeline currently | Discord community support |
Unity stands above all for community activity, learning content, and asset store support. Godot, Monogame, and Flax have small but helpful communities of users. OpenTK and Stride lag in available resources.
| Engine | Source License | Architecture | Ability to Extend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity | Source available but not fully open | Highly componentized and modular | Can extend with plugins, ECS, C# jobs system |
| Monogame | Open source (MIT) | Reasonably modular framework | Can customize and derive from classes |
| OpenTK | Open source (LGPL) | Thin OOP wrapper | Specifically built for customization on top |
| Godot | Open source (MIT) | Nodes and inheritance based | Extremely extensible through exposed APIs |
| Stride | Open source (MIT) | Modular but coupled | Can extend through exposed interfaces |
| Flax | Open source (MIT) | Monolithic architecture | Planned increased modularity |
Godot, Monogame, and OpenTK allow full customization being MIT or LGPL licensed. Unity allows some extension in predefined ways. Stride and Flax have more locked architectures but enable some custom plugins.
| Engine | Programming Knowledge Needed | Steepness | Beginner Friendly Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unity | C# helpful but can start without coding | Very high initial curve | Intuitive editor and visual scripting to learn basics |
| Monogame | Strong C# and graphics background mandatory | Extremely high | None - pure code focused |
| OpenTK | Advanced C# and graphics programming required | Incredibly high | None - assumes proficiency with graphics APIs |
| Godot | Some C# or GDScript helpful but not required | High but improving | Great editor tools and visual scripting for beginners |
| Stride | C# experience recommended | High but improving | Editor allows quick mockup and logic behaviors |
| Flax | Strong C# skills required currently | Very High | Powerful editor tools for level designers |
Unity and Godot offer the most beginner friendly editors and visual tools. OpenTK and Monogame expect proficiency with graphics coding and C#.
Based on our comparisons, here are some general recommendations on which C# engine fits best based on your game specifics and team:
For 2D projects, Godot likely offers the best combination of features, performance, and learning curve. Its node-based architecture excels for 2D. Unity is also great for 2D thanks to its robust tools. Either is a good choice depending on team experience.
For most 3D games, especially by small teams, Unity remains the wise choice. Its unbeatable features and vast learning resources outweigh its pricier licensing for success. More advanced teams could consider Godot or Flax as open source options.
For publishing across multiple platforms, Unity and Godot support the most deployment targets like desktop, console, mobile, and web. Monogame also allows iOS, Android, Linux, and more. OpenTK enables cross-platform through OpenGL but requires per platform ports.
For creating VR and AR experiences, Unity is by far the leader presently in terms of editor tools, C# APIs, and XR hardware support. It has the most resources for smoothing out the complexities of spatial computing development.
If raw CPU/GPU performance is critical, OpenTK or Flax allow you to get closer to the metal. Their lower overhead and control of graphics/compute APIs aid projects like simulations, benchmarks, and demanding applications.
To enable designers and less technical team members to collaborate on gameplay and content, Unity and Godot provide the most complete editor tooling. Stride shows promise here as well, allowing quick mocking up of gameplay ideas.
For building a customized engine from scratch with access to graphics APIs, OpenTK delivers the hooks needed. Flax offers source access with more built-in systems to build on top of. For full customization across platforms, OpenTK allows modifying its pipeline.
For web distribution, Godot shines with its HTML5 export templates providing small download sizes. Unity's WebGL support is solid as well but results in larger WebAssembly-based builds. Monogame and OpenTK support WebAssembly but require more manual porting.
Determining the right 3D game engine requires closely evaluating project requirements against engine capabilities and constraints. While overwhelming at first glance, tools like this guide help narrow down the options relevant to your team and project scope.
Both robust commercial engines like Unity and impressive open source projects like Godot offer amazing platforms for crafting beautiful 3D worlds using C# code. Each has pros and cons based on level of control, customization needs, performance constraints, and team experience.
Hopefully this guide has shed light on the most critical factors to weigh when choosing a C# game engine. Every project is unique, so do some research, try out demos, and don't be afraid to prototype with multiple options. With so many powerful engines now available, it's an exciting time to start building your 3D game vision.
If youwnat to read more interesting articles about game engines, then check on our blog.
Visit our site and see all other available articles!